Lesson

Design a trip planning website to capture and convey real-world factors such as gas prices and congestion information.

Evaluation of a Multimodal Trip Planning System (MMTPS) in Northeastern Illinois


May 2011
Chicago,Illinois,United States


Background (Show)

Lesson Learned

Although circumstances surrounding the demonstration project resulted in changes to the implementation plan that reduced the evaluation scope of work, researchers effectively documented the following useful lessons.

Project Management
  • Examine how changes to the technical, institutional, or external environment may impact the value of remaining project activities at each decision point throughout a project. These developments may be either internal to the project (e.g., the decision to go with COTS) or external (e.g., the introduction of Google Transit).
Systems Engineering
  • Clearly define user needs. A diminished focus on the systems engineering process can result in a system acceptance and verification plan that focuses more on technical functionality rather than user needs.
Marketing and Communication
  • Design a trip planning website to capture and convey real-world factors such as gas prices and congestion information. Market research reviewed during the project indicated that travel time information was important to travelers but it was not the sole reason for mode choice. Researchers indicated that a well designed trip planning website should be more than just an itinerary-trip planner, it should be able to effectively capture and convey real-world factors that make transit an increasingly attractive option. Researchers noted there was an increased desire for real-time vehicle location information, predictions, and disruption notification information, particularly when travelers were en-route and using mobile devices.
  • Ensure that project partners share the same goals, and that cumulative small decisions do not move the project away from one partner's goals. Third party channels to market can be useful, but should be part of the overall mix rather than a stand-alone marketing solution. By relying solely on an existing marketing campaign, the RTA Goroo team lost the ability to control the message, target particular market segments, or clearly convey what the product was.
Standards
  • Understand how to convert data between Transit Communications Interface Profiles Scheduling Business Area (TCIP-SCH) standards and General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS). It can be difficult for agencies to implement standards before their software providers (vendors) build such features into their systems. In the last few years, GTFS has become a common implementation for transit schedule information; agencies looking to apply TCIP-SCH may already use GTFS.
Technical Challenges to Project Delivery
  • Allow for time in the project schedule to address data integration issues. Data between autonomous agencies will differ in format and content. A demonstration project on a smaller scale can provide valuable insight into the consolidation of data feeds and issues with standards.
Trip Planning Environment
  • Be prepared for revisions to GTFS which will enable more real-time integration of trip planning data. Currently, it only provides static information. Although some progress has been made in introducing real-time information in to transit trip planning, in the trip planners reviewed, most transit trip planning systems are based on static schedules and itineraries generated are not dynamically responding to transit or traffic delays.
Public Sector Role
  • Implement multimodal trip planners for transportation organizations that are more multimodal in focus. Although trip planners were originally developed by the transit community, the demands and inputs needed to create a truly multimodal trip planner may go far beyond the scope of the transit agency mission or areas of expertise. While multimodal trip planners can encourage transit ridership by providing directions on walking, biking, or driving to transit, it may not be feasible for transit agencies to develop or even coordinate all of this information. Multimodal trip planners are better suited for transportation organizations with a more multimodal focus such as a regional transportation organization, a consortium of transportation stakeholders, as well as the private sector.


Lesson Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Lesson

To comment on this lesson, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

Multimodal Trip Planner System Final Evaluation Report

Author: Biernbaum, Lee; Lydia Rainville; and Arlen Spiro

Published By: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administration

Source Date: May 2011

Other Reference Number: Report No. FTA-MA-ITS-2011.1

URL: http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MMTPS_Final_Evaluation_05-24-2011(1).pdf

Lesson Contacts

Lesson Analyst:

Mike Mercer
Noblis
(202) 863-3646
michael.mercer@noblis.org


Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Lesson

(click stars to rate)


Lesson ID: 2012-00638