Lesson

Implement compatible Electronic Toll Collection systems in every state.

A retrospective of what's been learned since the first ITS Strategic Plan developed in 1992.


October, 2004
United States


Background (Show)

Lesson Learned

Various aspects of ITS are explored retrospectively, contrasting views from 1991/92, when the first ITS strategic plan was produced, with the reality of currently operational ITS projects. One topic that is evaluated for its anticipated benefits with the ultimate deployment reality is the importance of implementing compatible Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) systems in every state.
  • Expand compatible ETC systems for greater convenience to the traveling public: ETC is one example of the slowness of development that would not have been predicted by the strategic planners in the early 1990s. The lack of compatible ETC systems, even in regions with many small states like New England, is surprising. The inability of organizations in the public sector to cooperate in the development of common technologies for the convenience of the traveling public continues to be a major barrier to compatible ETC systems. It was relatively recently that the E-Z Pass system in the New York metropolitan area was implemented after a good deal of negotiation among the states of Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey. And it is even more recent that E-Z Pass has been made compatible with the FastLane system in Massachusetts. E-Z Pass or FastLane only now is becoming available in New England states other than Massachusetts and Connecticut, even though New England, with a number of small states, would clearly gain from compatible deployment of ETC.
  • Consider the importance of institutional issues: Most ambitiously, it would certainly be hoped that a nationally scaled compatible ETC system would be in place. Truckers, for whom long trips across political boundaries are common, would no doubt find this of great value. One could imagine a single transponder in rental cars, where the tolls could simply be added to the bill rather than the driver fumbling for change. But the current reading on getting a truly national system, which the strategic planners in the early 1990s viewed as important (and even straightforward), is that it is a long way off due to institutional issues. The strategic planners were not naïve about institutional issues; they realized that they were going to be very difficult in the deployment of a new technology in a conservative industry. But it is fair to say they grossly underestimated just how difficult it would be. For example, in a presentation at the ITS Massachusetts Annual Meeting in 2003, a scenario was told about two variable-message signs in rural central Massachusetts obtained “for free” through federal funding. The signs were not deployed for more than a year because of bureaucratic quibbling between two small public organizations over who would own and operate them.

This lesson points out that although many would argue that ETC is a major success story of ITS, with implementations all over the country and abroad, there are still many states without any deployed ETC, even though the technology has long been proven. Institutional issues have significantly delayed its actual implementation, even though the deployment of compatible ETC systems in every state would greatly increase convenience for the traveling public.


Lesson Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Lesson

To comment on this lesson, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

What We Know Now That We Wish We Knew Then About Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Retrospective on the 1992 Strategic Plan

Author: Joseph M. Sussman

Published By: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Source Date: October, 2004

Other Lessons From this Source

Lesson Contacts

Lesson Contact(s):

Joseph M. Sussman
MIT Engineering Systems Division
(617) 253-4430
sussman@mit.edu

Lesson Analyst:

Jane Lappin
Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
617-494-3692
jane.lappin@volpe.dot.gov


Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Lesson

(click stars to rate)


Lesson ID: 2006-00214