Lesson

Proactively establish working relationships with all partner stakeholder groups.

A Utah Department of Transportation Experience from the expansion of the CommuterLink intelligent transportation system.


October, 2008
Salt Lake City,Utah,United States; Orem,Utah,United States; Provo,Utah,United States


Background (Show)

Lesson Learned

The significant lesson learned from the deployment is the importance of the working relationships that UDOT and other State and local/municipal agencies have developed. UDOT was proactive in working with the participating agencies in planning the CommuterLink Expansion. UDOT held monthly meetings with project agency staff to discuss and resolve issues, and all State and local agencies involved in planning the expansion were included. To the State's credit, agencies from jurisdictions that were not in the initial phase of the CommuterLink expansion were included as full partners, which helped obtain local buy-in and support. In this regard, notable experiences from the CommuterLink Expansion project are summarized below.
  • Create conditions for effective collaboration among partner agencies. A key factor that contributed to the success of the CommuterLink Expansion was that UDOT worked collaboratively with local and municipal agencies to document system requirements. By utilizing this approach, UDOT ensured that:
    • The CommuterLink Expansion focused on meeting the needs of all stakeholder groups, not just a select group of agencies, and that the expansion was a collaborative effort rather than a top-down deployment.
    • Local and municipal agencies were able to take ownership of their components of the CommuterLink System as a result of being included in the initial requirements identification and documentation phase of the deployment.
In addition, operations and maintenance requirements and needs, both equipment and resources, were identified in advance and incorporated as part of the overall system expansion. Operations and maintenance are generally the responsibility of the system/equipment owner, and this approach enabled all participating agencies to plan for and request budget funds and technical resources to support CommuterLink in advance of the deployment. This approach gave all agencies the advance time needed to work through their respective budget processes in a timely manner.

Other lessons learned related to project management include:
  • Manage public expectations. The system's primary purpose is to improve operations. The secondary purpose is to provide better information to the public. It is important not to give the public the impression that the system will be able to "work magic", rather, information provided on improving operations should be focused and very clear so as not to raise expectations that cannot be met.
  • Plan in advance for long-term success in key areas.
    • Hardware Upgrades: Plan for hardware upgrades with respect to type of equipment, resource requirements, and funding.
    • Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Responsibilities: Identify early on, who is responsible for O&M, then determine resource requirements and funding needs.
    • Training Plan: Identify who needs training, what training is needed, and how the training will be provided.
The CommuterLink Expansion project is expected to augment the mobility improvements and cost savings previously reported for the original project (2). The successful partnership among the agencies and their collaborative efforts are major catalysts in achieving such mobility improvements and cost savings.

(1) Utah CommuterLink Website, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, last accessed June 25, 2008: <http://www.commuterlink.utah.gov/ie.htm>. Benefits information was derived from the following report: Dr. Joseph Perrin, R. Disegni, B. Rama., "Advanced Transportation Management System Elemental Cost Benefit Assessment", University of Utah, March 2004.

(2) Ibid


Lesson Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Lesson

To comment on this lesson, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

National Evaluation Program FY 2003 Earmark Evaluation: Utah CommuterLink Expansion Case Study Evaluation

Author: Nicholas Owens (SAIC); Les Jacobson (Telvent Farradyne), and Carol Mitchell (SAIC)

Published By: ITS Joint Program Office, RITA, U.S. Department of Transportation

Source Date: October, 2008

EDL Number: 14445

URL: http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/30000/30600/30642/14445.pdf

Other Lessons From this Source

Lesson Contacts

Lesson Contact(s):

Nicholas D. Owens
SAIC
703-676-2408
owensni@saic.com


Agency Contact(s):

Bryan Chamberlain
Utah Department of Transportation
801-887-3723
bchamberlain@utah.gov

Lesson Analyst:

Firoz Kabir
Noblis
202-863-2987
firoz.kabir@noblis.org


Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Lesson

(click stars to rate)


Application Areas

None defined

States

Utah

Countries

United States

Focus Areas

None defined

Goal Areas

Mobility

Keywords

None defined

Lesson ID: 2008-00447