Lesson

Anticipate project delays and allocate sufficient time and funding to address key project variables.

Experience from the smart parking field test at the Rockridge, Oakland BART station.


1 August 2007
Oakland,California,United States


Background (Show)

Lesson Learned

Throughout the design and implementation of a project, issues may arise that add time and money to the project schedule and budget. The following demonstrates the lessons learned from the schedule and budget challenges experienced by those involved in the BART smart parking field test.
  • Be aware of economic fluctuations that can impact site selection. In order to test the effect of smart parking technologies on parking demand, researchers created site selection criteria that included a location that was at or near maximum parking capacity. An initial site was chosen; however an economic downturn in the Bay Area lessened the parking demand at the station before the project began. Thus, a new site was chosen that met the site selection criteria.
  • Allocate additional time for the project scoping phase and permitting process. Numerous public and private agencies were involved in developing and implementing the smart parking field test. While the project partners anticipated project delays associated with coordinating the numerous agencies and addressing project variables, they found that their initial schedule of six months for the scoping phase was inadequate and an additional three months was needed. Similarly, the field test required numerous permits in order to install and operate equipment in the BART and Caltrans rights-of-way. The project partners allocated two months for permitting, however, it took between six to seven months to secure all necessary permits.
  • Budget for an impact evaluation on highway traffic flow due to the CMSs. The changeable message signs (CMSs) used in the BART smart parking field test were placed on Highway 24 before and after a heavily traveled three-bore tunnel. Researchers were interested in determining whether the signs impeded traffic. However, the traffic impact analysis was limited and did not result in accurate information. If CMSs are to be used, it is important to plan and budget for a detailed CMS impact evaluation in order to ensure that they are not negatively affecting highway traffic flow.
  • Invest in enforcement technology and personnel. During the field test, parking reservations were enforced using two methods: 1) a list of license plate numbers for vehicles with reservations was faxed to the enforcement officer; and 2) two personal digital assistants (PDAs) were assigned to enforcement personnel to access registered smart parking user license plate information. The field test did not employ enough PDAs for each enforcement personnel because the budget did not plan for them. Those enforcement personnel without the PDAs experienced difficulty in identifying vehicles that did not have a valid smart parking registration. The partners involved agreed that an increased investment in enforcement technology would be beneficial in the future.
The experiences of the smart parking field test at the Rockridge, Oakland BART station indicate the diversity of project variables that need to be considered when determining a project's budget and schedule. The project management team should allocate sufficient time and resources to address anticipated issues, and anticipate that additional issues are sure to arise unexpectedly.


Lesson Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Lesson

To comment on this lesson, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

Smart Parking Linked to Transit: Lessons Learned from the San Francisco Bay Area Field Test

Author: Susan Shaheen and Charlene Kemmerer

Published By: Transportation Research Board

Source Date: 1 August 2007

URL: http://pubs.its.ucdavis.edu/download_pdf.php?id=1095

Other Lessons From this Source

Lesson Contacts

Lesson Analyst:

Gina Filosa
RITA/Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
617-494-3452
gina.filosa@volpe.dot.gov


Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Lesson

(click stars to rate)


Lesson ID: 2008-00443