Establish a centralized database for all winter maintenance-related weather information.

An Idaho Transportation Department experience in Road-Weather Information System integration.

Idaho; United States

Background (Show)

Lesson Learned

This project demonstrated the value of establishing a consolidated, Internet source of road-weather information that includes many types of data from a wide variety of sources. The ITD experience with RWIS data integration and sharing provides several suggestions for RWIS deployers:
  • Participate in weather data sharing partnerships. Through their participation in the MesoWest weather information sharing consortium coordinated by the University of Utah, for a very nominal initial investment in time and money (a few thousand dollars), the ITD was able to access data from a large number of ESS operated by a wide range of organizations throughout Idaho and in bordering areas. The utility of the other organizations' ESS for the ITD varies greatly, depending on what data are collected, where the station is sited, and how well the station is calibrated and maintained. Not all of the other organizations' stations will provide a long-term alternative to implementation of ITD's own ESS. At a minimum, however, the ITD has found that tapping into other organizations' ESS data to be a good short-term strategy for filling gaps in RWIS data collection coverage.
  • Provide winter maintenance personnel with an accessible, consolidated source of weather information. Most of ITD maintenance personnel that were interviewed and surveyed found significant value in the RWIDS webpage and used it frequently. Monthly RWIDS sessions peaked at just over 2,500 sessions during mid-winter (January and February). About 78% of surveyed users consulted the site at least multiple times per week during the winter. Maintenance users found value in most of the wide variety of data presented on the site. Nearly all (about 80%) of the data types were accessed in at least 10% of web sessions. However, RWIS operators should expect that the utilization of a consolidated weather data source such as RWIDS would be significantly lower among users lacking high-speed Internet access and/or in areas where there were few ESS of interest.
  • Do not assume a consolidated source of winter maintenance decision support information will serve as a complete "one-stop-shop". Although most maintenance personnel found the RWIDS webpage useful, most of them continued to rely on other sources of information as well. In some cases they consulted websites for the same information included on RWIDS (e.g., going directly to the National Weather Service website) because it was easier to access. Therefore, RWIS operators should expect that even a well-designed consolidated weather information source would not completely replace other information gathering strategies.
  • Develop a common data specification for ESS data integration. In the course of integrating data from their two existing brands of ESS and establishing a single user interface, the ITD established a format for ESS data. They have been successful in requiring ESS vendors to comply with that format. Having established a means to integrate data from various brands of ESS, the ITD has been able to purchase stations from different vendors, at significantly lower costs, saving about $7,500 per station in a recent procurement.
This lesson suggests that sharing ESS data with other organizations is a very cost-effective way to enhance weather data collection coverage. The ITD experience also indicates that providing a consolidated source for a wide range of winter weather information to state highway maintenance personnel contributes to their effectiveness and productivity. Finally, several maintenance personnel have indicated that access to good ESS data may reduce the amount of field patrolling necessary to observe road and weather conditions. If so, providing maintenance personnel with road weather information could also provide energy and environmental benefits, i.e., reduced fuel consumption and vehicle emissions.

Lesson Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Lesson

To comment on this lesson, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.


Final Evaluation Report: Evaluation of the Idaho Transportation Department Integrated Road-Weather Information System

Published By: U.S. DOT Federal Highway Administration

Prepared by Battelle for the USDOT FHWA

Source Date: 2/2/2006

EDL Number: 14267

URL: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/3769

Other Lessons From this Source

Lesson Contacts

Lesson Contact(s):

Jeff Jenq

Agency Contact(s):

Bryon Breen
Idaho Transportation Department

Lesson Analyst:

Firoz Kabir


Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Lesson

(click stars to rate)

Lesson ID: 2006-00237