Benefit

Implementing a collision-avoidance algorithm based on safe distance significantly reduces rear-end collisions in heterogenous fleets compared to other methods.

The algorithm is of use in situations where both human-operated and fully-automated vehicles are present.


09/10/2018


Summary Information

A study at Tsinghua University in Beijing investigated the dynamics of a road that contains both automated vehicles and human-operated vehicles. This scenario indicates the intermediate state between contemporary behavior and a future conversion to a road of entirely automated vehicles. The heterogenous mix of automated and human-operated vehicles is of interest because many of the benefits of completely automated fleets, such as being able to handle significantly closer following distances, are mitigated by the presence of human operators. However, the transitional phase is expected to last a substantial amount of time, and thus it is important to understand the dynamics of how human-operated vehicles interact with fully automated vehicles.

The primary subject of this investigation was the comparison of four common rear-end collision avoidance algorithms, and a simulation was carried out to examine how these algorithms performed under various automated-vehicle market penetration rates. The study used a simulation platform designed and constructed in MATLAB, which allowed for more flexible data processing. Eleven scenarios were examined, with automated-vehicle market penetration rates ranging from 0 to 100 percent. The average rates of crashes for each car an 11-car fleet were examined and used to evaluate each collision avoidance algorithm's performance.

The study found two algorithms to be significantly more effective than others at reducing collisions towards the rear of the fleet. One of them minimized deceleration until hitting a "safe distance" to the next car, and the other was a cooperative deceleration algorithm that coordinated deceleration among the vehicles to minimize the total relative kinetic energy density.
  • The Safe Distance algorithm was also found to have the strongest efficacy in eliminating crashes at market penetration rates below 80 percent. At 40 percent market penetration, the algorithm resulted in less than half as many predicted collisions.
  • The Total Relative Kinetic Energy Density algorithm was found to have the potential to eliminate crashes altogether at a penetration rate of 100 percent, while also being the most effective at minimizing the severity (but not occurrence) of crashes at any market penetration rate.

Benefit Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Benefit

To comment on this summary, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

Longitudinal Safety Analysis For Heterogeneous Platoon Of Automated And Human Vehicles

Author: Yang, Zi, et.al.)

Published By: IEEE

Source Date: 09/10/2018

URL: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1809/1809.03481.pdf

Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Benefit

(click stars to rate)


Goal Areas

Safety

Typical Deployment Locations

Statewide

Keywords

heterogeneous platoon, collision rate, collision severity, cooperative control, simulation platform

Benefit ID: 2018-01317