Establish a working group among public sector partners to address liability issues.

A Phoenix area experience with establishing procedures for cross jurisdictional signal control.

December 2000
Maricopa County,Arizona,United States

Background (Show)

Lesson Learned

An area of potential concern for many metropolitan areas is the sharing of system control by more than a single jurisdiction. This is a frequent concern for jurisdictions that operate a traffic signal control system with arterials that cross one or more jurisdictions. To reduce liability, good planning and engineering practices must be exercised when establishing procedures to share control among agencies.

Some public sector partners in the Phoenix metropolitan area note that liability issues in their area have already been resolved through discussions in the Signals Working Group, a regional group that looks at coordinating traffic signals along corridors running through several jurisdictions. Through their involvement in the working group, participants are confident that only appropriate actions will be taken when representatives of one jurisdiction assume temporary control of another jurisdiction's traffic signal system.

Engineers in the Phoenix area established the following practices within the Signals Working Group to avoid potential liability issues.
  • Define and document a series of thresholds under which signal plans can be altered.
  • Establish written coordination policies and plans to cover signalized corridors bordering multiple jurisdictions.
The key to overcoming any constraint is to acknowledge its likelihood and address it early. Project participants should anticipate these obstacles and come to the table prepared to discuss them.

This lesson illustrates how a metropolitan area can work together to circumvent any liability issues that may surface by establishing a discussion group and developing a set of plans and procedures to share traffic signal control among multiple jurisdictions. Cross jurisdictional signal control can lead to significant benefits for a region having considerable impact on the performance of a corridor and contributing to the achievement of several ITS goals including: safety, mobility, efficiency, and customer satisfaction. Addressing liability issues and documenting procedures in a working group forum relieves some of the reservations agencies may have when it comes to considering cross jurisdictional signal control.

Lesson Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Lesson

To comment on this lesson, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.


What Have We Learned About ITS?

Author: Joseph Sussman, et al. (MIT)

Published By: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. DOT

Source Date: December 2000

EDL Number: 13316

Other Reference Number: Report No. FHWA-OP-01-006

URL: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/3809

Other Lessons From this Source

Lesson Contacts

Lesson Analyst:

Cheryl Lowrance


Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Lesson

(click stars to rate)




United States

Systems Engineering

Show the V

None defined


coordinated signals, signal coordination, centralized signal control, signal synchronization, traffic signals, advanced signal control, signal timing optimization, coordinated signal control, advanced signal controller, traffic signal retiming, retiming

Lesson ID: 2006-00299