Benefit

Autonomous Shuttle Bus piloted in Minnesota is well-received by the public following successful demonstration of navigating in wintry conditions.

Autonomous Shuttle Bus testing and demonstration in Minnesota provides a good first step in understanding the impacts of winter climate on automated technology.


06/27/2018


Summary Information

Cold and snowy winter weather conditions create several unique challenges for automated vehicle (AV) operations. To better understand operations of an automated shuttle bus in winter weather conditions, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) conducted an Autonomous Bus Pilot project.

The test vehicle, with no steering wheel or brake pedal and a Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Level 4 autonomy classification, was able to navigate autonomously using pre-mapped routes. An on-board localization system that included GPS, LIDAR sensors and an odometry and inertial measurement unit allowed the automated shuttle bus to operate accurately on the pre-programmed route. The shuttle bus was equipped with four-wheel drive, winter tires and an interior heater.

A demonstration of the automated shuttle bus was held for select transportation professionals in December 2017 and January 2018 on a controlled test track at MnROAD in Albertville, Minnesota. This was followed by public demonstrations of the automated shuttle bus near Nicolett Mall in downtown Minneapolis, Minnesota between January 24th and January 28th in conjunction with community activities that preceded Super Bowl LII. Five additional demonstrations were held between February and April of 2018 at 3M, the City of Rochester, the University of Minnesota, Hennepin County, and Bismarck, North Dakota.

Demonstration Findings
  • The automated shuttle bus operated well under dry pavement conditions with no precipitation. The vehicle kept a safe operating distance from other vehicles, pedestrians, bicycles and other roadway obstructions on the track, performing slowdowns and stops as needed. Daytime and nighttime light conditions did not impact the shuttle performance.
  • Falling snow, blowing snow, or loose snow on the track was often detected as obstructions by vehicle sensors, causing the vehicle to slow down or stop to avoid a collision.
  • Snow banks alongside the vehicle routes caused issues with pre-programmed paths. Snow banks had to be removed at the Minnesota Capitol demonstration and the Hennepin County demonstration was delayed a week from plan to allow the snow banks to melt.
  • At times, compacted snow and patches of ice or slush on the track caused the wheels to slip, which in turn created issues with the bus not responding to its exact location on the track.
  • Salt spray from treated sections of roadway that collected on the vehicle sensors did not appear to significantly degrade performance. While some minor anomalies were observed, the reason could not be confirmed. Cleaning dirt accumulation from the sensors due to normal operations appeared to improve the automated shuttle bus performance.
  • There is a need for continued technology enhancements by the vendor to fully address winter operations and testing in different roadway environments. For example, further development work is required for interfacing automated shuttle bus operations with traffic signals and stop/yield signs. Because of the rural nature of the MnROAD site, the vehicle required installation of localization infrastructure. Signs posts were installed approximately every 100 feet around the test loop.
  • As the core temperature of the battery dropped significantly, automated shuttle bus operations were negatively impacted. Charging times during colder temperatures increased compared to charging times during warmer temperatures.

Public Opinion

A survey was distributed to demonstration participants on the shuttle, featuring questions that assessed the public’s level of familiarity with automated vehicles, riders’ comfort level with a driverless vehicle, and how the public feels about expanding the use of automated vehicle technology. Most of the responses to the survey questions were positive. Riders commented that they were excited to participate in Minnesota’s first public AV demonstration, and in general, looked forward to future developments of AV technology. Some riders commented that they would like to see the shuttle operate outside of such controlled conditions on Nicollet Mall and wondered if all safety concerns have been addressed.

Benefit Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Benefit

To comment on this summary, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

MnDOT Autonomous Bus Pilot Project Testing and Demonstration Summary

Author: WSB & AECOM

Published By: Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services & Library

Source Date: 06/27/2018

Other Reference Number: MN/RC 2016-XX

URL: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/automated/bus/finalreport.pdf

Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Benefit

(click stars to rate)


Typical Deployment Locations

Metropolitan Areas

Keywords

None defined

Benefit ID: 2018-01300