Consider the technology selected for an ITS telecommunications system carefully, as it will impact the cost and the performance of the system.

Experiences from the Departments of Transportation (DOTS) of multiple states in selecting telecommunications options.

Michigan,United States

Background (Show)

Lesson Learned

When deciding on the appropriate telecommunications technology, agencies will be faced with a number of potential alternatives. A careful consideration of these alternatives is required, as the decision will have an impact on the cost as well as the performance of the system. The following set of lessons learned is offered to provide agencies with guidance in selecting the appropriate telecommunications technology.
  • Develop a detailed understanding of the requirements. When making a choice, agencies must first ensure that they have a complete understanding of all aspects of their requirements and of their existing telecommunications infrastructure. This will increase the likelihood that the appropriate technology is selected.
  • Evaluate each technology alternative according to a set of established evaluation factors. Stakeholders should agree on the set of factors to be used in evaluating different technology alternatives. Factors considered in decisions examined for this study included:
    • Ease of interfacing with the existing ITS telecommunications infrastructure.
    • Reliability of the technology.
    • Ease of maintenance.
    • Ability to meet current needs.
    • Capacity for expansion to meet future needs (both in terms of total capacity and in terms of geographic distribution).
    • Implementation costs, total life cycle costs, and available budget.
    • Time needed for implementation.
    • Ability of the agency to operate and maintain the eventual network, based in staffing and skills constraints.
Several examples of the factors considered by agencies and how these shaped their selection of an appropriate technology alternative include:

In the 1990s, the Michigan DOT had decided to significantly expand its Advanced Traffic Management System, at the same time as road reconstruction was occurring. Due to the reconstruction, cable based telecommunications was unattractive, as the cable might be damaged by the road work. The agency was also limited in its funding, so it decided to implement a hybrid network. The base of the network was a high capacity, fully redundant self-healing fiber optic ring. From this ring, microwave spokes extended to hub locations from which telecommunications to field devices was carried over copper cables.

In its initial design for an ATMS, the telecommunications included copper twisted pair, using repeaters to boost signals over longer portions of the network. The successful bidder for the contract, however, proposed conversion of a significant portion of the network to fiber optic cable, using a mix of multimode and single mode cabling, which would be coupled to the copper and coaxial cable connections of the field devices at telecommunications hubs. The following factors were cited in support of fiber optic over the copper twisted pair:
    • The implementation would cost the same.
    • The fiber optic system could be expanded more easily in capacity, length and number of connections.
    • Signal quality of the fiber optic network would likely be superior to the copper network.
    • The fiber optic network could be just as easily managed.
    • There was less likelihood of degradation of the signal and network performance over time due to cable corrosion.
Each agency will face a different set of constraints in deciding among alternative ITS telecommunications technologies. It is critical that agencies understand these constraints, as well as the full set of requirements for their system, so that they can develop criteria, or factors, for evaluating the different technology alternatives. Through careful consideration of the alternative technologies, agencies can insure that their final selection will be cost efficient and will meet their needs.

Lesson Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Lesson

To comment on this lesson, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.


Communications for Intelligent Transportation Systems - Successful Practices: A Cross-Cutting Study

Author: Vince Pearce

Published By: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration

Source Date: 2000

EDL Number: 11488

Other Reference Number: FHWA-JPO-99-023/FTA-TRI-11-99-02

URL: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/2867

Other Lessons From this Source

Lesson Contacts

Lesson Contact(s):

James Pol

Agency Contact(s):

Richard Dye
Chesapeake Highway Advisories Routing Traffic

Lesson Analyst:

Margaret Petrella
RITA/Volpe National Transportation Systems Center


Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Lesson

(click stars to rate)

Application Areas

None defined




United States

Systems Engineering

Show the V

System Requirements

Focus Areas

None defined

Goal Areas



None defined

Lesson ID: 2007-00367