Benefit

A prototype intelligent pedestrian traffic signal system tested at an intersection in Valladolid, Spain successfully reduced pedestrian wait times, resulting in a 23 percent reduction of pedestrian crowding at crosswalks.

EU-funded study pilots Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) to improve the safety and mobility of vulnerable road users (VRU) through ITS applications


02/01/2016
Valladolid; Spain


Summary Information

The VRUITS project, which is sponsored by the European Commission DG MOVE, places the Vulnerable Road User (VRU) in the center, assesses the impact of current and upcoming ITS applications on the safety and mobility of VRUs, identifies how the usability and efficiency of ITS applications can be improved, and recommends which actions have to be taken at a policy level to improve ITS safety and mobility. By applying a multi-disciplinary approach, the VRUITS project aims at developing tools to evaluate, field-test and subsequently improve ITS for vulnerable road users.

Feeling they have to wait too long for the green light signaling it is safe to cross, a large amount of pedestrians of an intersection in Valladolid, Spain cross during red phase, putting their safety a risk. A trial designed with the aim of improving pedestrian mobility and safety by actuating the traffic lights according to the real pedestrian demand was thus implemented.

Intelligent Pedestrian Detectors (IPDs) were installed on the selected crossing, which automatically detect pedestrians on the sidewalk next to the crossing. Based on their trajectories, IPDs decide whether pedestrians are waiting to cross the intersection, and request green light to the Traffic Light Controller (TLC) if there are a certain number of persons waiting. Then the TLC decides whether to give priority to pedestrians over vehicles and extend their green phase, based on the state of the traffic lights.

A total of four IPDs were installed in this crossing using the existing infrastructure. The information is centralized by an Interface Box, which acts as a control module gathering all the data computed by the IPDs and interacts with the Traffic Controller. Also, two lights as part of an Illumination on demand module were added to the trial to illuminate the crossing automatically when pedestrians are detected during night hours, thus enhancing visibility and alerting drivers of the presence of pedestrians in the crossing.

Methodology

Measurements were performed from May 4 – 10, 2015 without the system active and from April 27– May 3, 2015 with the system active. Data were logged by the IPDs and the TLC. IPDs were set to record videos internally from the intersection’s cameras showing the counts and trajectories. Waiting times of each pedestrian, from the moment they stopped in the waiting area until they left to cross the road was determined from the video. The data were sent periodically to the modem inside the TLC for remote transmission and analysis.

Safety and mobility impacts were analyzed in terms of waiting times, illegal crossings and crowd gathering at the crossing, with and without actuating the traffic lights. In addition, interviews were held with the crosswalk users. In total 43 users were interviewed (22 prior to the tests and 21 after the tests).

Findings
  • The percent of illegal crossings were reduced by 5 percent
  • There was a reduction in pedestrian wait time of about 2 seconds
  • Congestion diminished by 23 percent when the system was operating, thus reducing the risks implied by having crowds gathered frequently in an intersection with heavy traffic
  • The interviews showed that there were no significant differences in the subjective feeling of safety with and without the system.
  • In both periods, more than 80 percent (33 participants) of the respondents considered that the waiting time for the pedestrians was unsuitable. The system reduced the waiting time, but the users did not perceive that change.

Benefit Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Benefit

To comment on this summary, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

Improving the safety and mobility of vulnerable road users through ITS applications: Deliverable D5.3 Evaluation Results

Author: Scholliers, Johan; Esra van Dam; Kerry Malone; Dennis Heuven; Erwin de Gelder; Valentina Brantova; Johana Gonzalez Luna; Sandra Martín Fernández; Oscar Martin Perez

Published By: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

Source Date: 02/01/2016


Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Benefit

(click stars to rate)


Benefit ID: 2018-01233