Benefit

Automated speed enforcement systems decreased injury accidents by 5 to 26 percent.

Experience with automated speed enforcement in Norway.


1997
Norway


Summary Information

This study examined the use of automated speed enforcement in Norway. The system was designed to photograph drivers and license plates of vehicles who triggered speed detection settings calibrated above the posted speed limit by police. If vehicle license plate numbers were visible, a standard traffic ticket was issued to the owner. If the owner denied the charges, the law required the owner to identify the driver. The objective of this study was to observe changes in accident rates, vehicle speeds, and property damages before and after photo radar gun deployment on 64 warranted and non-warranted roadway sections.

The following warrants for automated speed enforcement were published in 1993 by the Public Roads Administration in Norway:
  • The mean traffic speed on the road section was greater than the posted speed.
  • The road section had an accident density of at least 0.5 injury accidents per km of roadway.
  • The accident rate on the road section was higher than the normal accident rate for that type of road.
It should be noted that automatic speed enforcement was implemented on many roadway segments up to five years before the warrants were published; therefore, from 1988-1992 many segments had automated speed enforcement even though they did not conform to all of the warrants published in 1993.

The road sections in this study ranged from 0.56 kilometers (km) to 20.0 km in length. The average "before" period was 3.94 years, and the average "after" period was 4.61 years. The data collection effort was completed by 1996.

As a result of limited “before? data related to vehicle speeds and property damage, the evaluation focused primarily on changes in accident rates.

RESULTS

After the deployment of automated speed enforcement the number of injury accidents declined by 20 percent. However, this reduction varied depending on whether the roadway segment met Norway’s warrants for deployment of automated speed enforcement.
  • On roadway sections meeting the warrants injury accidents declined by 26 percent.
  • On roadway sections not meeting the warrants injury accidents declined by 5 percent.
The author noted the findings in this study were limited. In general, the lack of speed data made it impossible to study the impact of automated speed enforcement on traffic speed, and the impact of traffic speed on accident rates. In addition, there were no data concerning the frequency and duration of system operations making it impossible to evaluate effects of "intensity of use" on changes in traffic speed and accidents. Also, driver behavior such as the "kangaroo effect," that causes drivers to slow down and then speed up after they pass a photo enforcement zone, was not investigated.

Notes

See Also:
Feasibility of Real-Time Remote Speed Enforcement in Work Zones, TRB 2002

Benefit Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Benefit

To comment on this summary, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

Effects on Accidents of Automatic Speed Enforcement in Norway

Author: Elvik, R.


Published By: Transportation Research Board

Source Date: 1997

Other Reference Number: TRR 1595

URL: http://www.gridchicago.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/rune.pdf

Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Benefit

(click stars to rate)


Goal Areas

Safety

Typical Deployment Locations

Metropolitan Areas

Keywords

photo enforcement, speed cameras, automated speed enforcement, automated enforcement, photo radar

Benefit ID: 2002-00235