Commuters receiving reliability information were on-time 6 percent more frequently than commuters without reliability information

Trip simulation experiment proves the provision of traveler information results in improved on-time performance and lower generalized travel disutility.

Dallas,Texas,United States; Denver,Colorado,United States; Hartford,Connecticut,United States; Miami,Florida,United States; San Jose,California,United States

Summary Information

A research project by the second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2) used a trip simulation approach to assess the value that participants placed on traveler information and to determine whether having reliable information helped speed the transition from an unfamiliar commuter to an experienced commuter. The experiment was conducted in five cities (Dallas, Denver, Hartford, Miami and San Jose) over a period of 4 months and acquired information from 80 participants. The participants were brought into a survey room and were presented with a scenario that involved them commuting in an unfamiliar city with a constrained arrival time (with penalties for both late and early arrival) for two work weeks (10 commutes).

The participants had access to one of three additive levels of travel time information for their planned route and optional route deviations:
    1. real-time advisory messages only,
    2. real-time advisories plus real-time travel time information, or
    3. real-time advisories plus both real-time and reliability (historical travel time range) information.

A moderator read aloud the contextual setup text presented in the experiment and informed participants that different individuals would have access to differing levels of traveler information. Participants then used the experiment information to make commute decisions at their own pace to complete commutes by maneuvering in an Excel-based interface using dedicated laptops. The participants selected from among three departure time options (7:45 a.m., 8:00 a.m., and 8:15 a.m.) and two potential alternate route options to arrive at their destination on time. If not on time, participants incurred a $25.00 late-fee or were forced to pay an early arrival parking cost. All participants received the real-time advisory messages (from simulated DMSs deployed along the simulated route) while a subset of the participants could actively acquire the higher levels of real-time and reliability information by pressing an interface button.

Specific questions regarding levels of trip stress and on-time arrival confidence were completed at each waypoint and at the beginning and end of each trip, as relevant. Participants also completed a post-experiment survey that asked them to rate the usefulness of traveler information at the beginning and toward the end of the experiment.

  • Participants indicated willingness to pay for traveler information, on-time arrival confidence level, trip stress level, satisfaction level with trip outcome, and traveler information usefulness for each of the 10 completed trips.
  • Reliability Information Reduced Pre-Trip and En-Route Trip Stress for Unfamiliar Trips.
  • Experimental participants who received reliability information were on time more frequently (85 percent versus 79 percent) and had lower total late and early arrival penalties associated with the simulated trip ($38.61 versus $47.42 and $55.55 in the two control groups).

Benefit Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Benefit

To comment on this summary, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.


Effectiveness of Different Approaches to Disseminating Traveler Information on Travel Time Reliability

Published By: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies

Source Date: 03/01/2013



Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Benefit

(click stars to rate)

Benefit ID: 2016-01073