Benefit

Speed camera programs can reduce crashes by 9 to 51 percent.

Results from a Worldwide evaluation of automated speed enforcement.


September 2007
Nationwide; United States; Nationwide; Canada


Summary Information

A 2007 literature review by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) documented studies of speed camera and red light camera (RLC) programs worldwide. Red light cameras are set up to photograph vehicles entering intersections after signals have turned red. Detection of an offense is made by sensors buried in the pavement and tied to a timing system integrating the traffic signal and pole-mounted camera. Photographs of a vehicle entering an intersection illegally and the license plate number are taken and then reviewed by the jurisdiction. The owner of the vehicle then may receive a citation. RLCs are used worldwide, most heavily in Australia, Canada, Europe, Singapore, and the United States.

Automated speed enforcement cameras take single spot or average vehicle speeds over several measurements. Most speed cameras use a low-powered Doppler radar speed sensor that triggers the camera to photograph vehicles traveling above a preset speed as they pass a specified point. The camera records the date, time, and vehicle speed, and usually is set to activate only when a vehicle is traveling significantly faster than the posted limit. Photo radar often is accompanied by a visible law enforcement presence to maximize the deterrence effect, but cameras can also be deployed unattended. Photographic evidence is reviewed and a citation is issued to the owner of the vehicle.

The relationship between speed and traffic safety is generally well accepted by researchers and public safety officials. That higher speeds are associated with increasing crash severity is particularly difficult to deny, both from highway safety research and physical laws. Correlational studies also suggest that the probability of a crash is related to speed, both on an individual level and on an average traffic speed level, although the evidence is not as conclusive. The incidence of single vehicle (run-off-road) crashes increases sharply with higher speeds, providing additional suggestive evidence of a relationship between crash frequency and speed.

Results

The crash reductions reported for speed cameras ranged between 9 and 51 percent. The review also discussed rigorous studies of red light camera programs in 18 U.S. cities and 6 Canadian cities. The studies typically found a decrease in right-angle crashes and an increase in rear-end crashes, with the severity of the right-angle crashes (and associated costs) outweighing that of the rear-end crashes.

Benefit Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Benefit

To comment on this summary, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

Automated Enforcement: A Compendium of Worldwide Evaluations of Results

Author: Decina, Lawrence E. et al.

Published By: U.S. DOT National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Prepared by TransAnalytics for the U.S. DOT National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Source Date: September 2007

Other Reference Number: DOT HS 810 763

URL: http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/Traffic%20Injury%20Control/Articles/Associated%20Files/HS810763.pdf

Rating

Average User Rating

2 (1 rating)

Rate this Benefit

(click stars to rate)


Goal Areas

Safety

Keywords

photo enforcement, speed cameras, automated speed enforcement, automated enforcement, photo radar

Benefit ID: 2008-00505