Benefit

Heads-up display showing stop and caution warning signs helped older drivers brake sooner in German driving simulator study.

Older drivers are over-represented in urban crashes, in-vehicle driver warning systems may help with this problem.


10/14/2015
Nationwide; Germany


Summary Information

Driver warning systems are a tool in the pursuit of safer urban areas due to the high complexity of the environment, this may be even more of an issue for older drivers as they are over-represented in crashes. The aim of this driving simulator study was to determine whether a heads-up warning showing either a stop sign warning (SW) or caution sign warning (CW) 2.5 seconds prior to the anticipated crash would have a better effect on the driving performance of older drivers (compared to the control group) in scenarios of different criticalities.
Thirty-six older drivers (average age of 71.9, average 49.7 years driving experience) were divided into three groups: SW, CW, and a control. Each participant drove through four scenarios.
  • Pedestrian 1 scenario: while turning a pedestrian crosses the vehicle’s path.
  • Pedestrian 2 scenario: a pedestrian, obscured by parking cars, suddenly crosses the vehicle path.
  • Vehicle scenario: lead vehicle comes to a sudden stop.
  • Obstacle scenario: driver is confronted with a hay bale hidden behind a hill.
In each scenario the vehicle driven by the participant travels through a simulated urban road and has to make a turn when indicated by a voice output and an arrow in the speedometer. After the test drive, each subject was asked about the criticality and surprise of each scenario.
Driving data was logged by the simulation software. Participant’s subjective data was converted to a rating on a scale from 1 to 15.

Findings/Benefits
Participants rated the Pedestrian 2 and Pedestrian 1 scenarios to be highly critical and highly surprising, revealing that the four implemented scenarios were of different criticalities.

The SW brake reaction time was the fastest in each scenario, followed by the CW. In the study, the SW had a positive effect on shortening the brake reaction time. Similar results are found when considering the maximum braking value. This variable was descriptively the highest to the SW, meaning that participants hit the brake pedal the hardest here compared to the CW and the control condition. Furthermore, the SW led to almost always the lowest mean velocity when reaching the maximum braking value.

The results of the study show that it is important to know what behavior a warning might trigger. In scenarios where the driver has to react immediately, the SW is best suited. But, if a sudden and firm brake reaction is not needed, as in the Vehicle and Obstacle scenario, the SW warning could have negative effects (e.g., high maximum braking value) and the CW is better suited.


Benefit Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Benefit

To comment on this summary, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

Towards developing a head-up display warning system - How to support older drivers in urban areas?

Author: Kazazi, Juela; Susann Winkler; and Mark Vollrath

Published By: 2015 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter Annual Meeting

Source Date: 10/14/2015

URL: http://www.hfes-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Kazazi2015.pdf

Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Benefit

(click stars to rate)


Benefit ID: 2016-01122