Create multi-modal ITS plans focusing on needs and update them frequently, balancing process and projects and considering communication and coordination while ensuring that adequate resources are dedicated to implementation.

National experience with ITS strategic planning at the overview level.

Arizona,United States; Caltrans District 5 (San Luis Obispo),California,United States; Jackson County,Oregon,United States; Siskiyou County,California,United States; Colorado,United States; Kansas,United States; Minnesota,United States; Montana,United States; Nebraska,United States; New Mexico,United States; New York,United States; Oregon,United States; Washington,United States

Background (Show)

Lesson Learned

Create multi-modal ITS plans focusing on needs and update them frequently, balancing process and projects and considering communication and coordination while ensuring that adequate resources are dedicated to implementation:
    • Implementation
    The ITS Strategic assessment should ensure that adequate resources are dedicated to implementation. Specific projects for implementation should be identified and targeted deployment schedules established.
    • Strategic Plan Updates
    Since ITS technology and practices are evolving so quickly and given the novelty of ITS to many Stakeholders, and since regional circumstances are continuously evolving frequent ITS strategic planning is as important as having a written plan. Therefore, updating planes annually is a useful undertaking. Regional Stakeholders should monitor continuing ITS project deployments in the region, and then maintain and update the project database in order to evaluate the expected benefits.
    • Projects vs. Process
    Balancing the ITS planning process with the selection of recommended ITS projects is the key to maintaining stakeholder interest while satisfying federal and state guidelines. Most non-transportation agencies do not get involved in ITS until real, funded projects are begun. Usually these other agencies will only be willing to contribute resources or initiate new projects when they begin to comprehend benefits to them. Care should be taken, however, to ensure that the Region-/Statewide Strategic Plan is not just a “cookie cutter” study; each strategic assessment requires targeted, creative application of ITS.
    • Communication & Coordination
    Communication between stakeholders and coordination of ITS initiatives is important to the long-term success of an ITS program. Coordinated planning helps ensure that ITS deployments are integrated into the state’s broader architecture. Coordinated, concurrent deployments and parallel efforts among different regions are helpful to ensure that systems work together and to avoid redundant or superfluous efforts.

    In addition, close communication between the state DOT and district- level staff at the outset of the planning effort can very useful. If there is coordination, then early winners or early successful implementations by a district become known at the state level and can then be shared with other regions.
    • Multi-Modal & Transit
    While developing a multi- modal focus for the state/region may be difficult due to the multi-State nature of CVO systems and the fragmentary nature of Regional transit systems, it is an attainable (and desired) goal. Given the rapid proliferation of ITS technologies throughout the transit and CVO communities, a multi- modal focus should be central feature of ITS strategic plans.
    • Focus on Needs, not Available Technologies
    Finally, make sure that the ITS Strategic Plan does not involve "technology in search of a problem"; should be taken that needs are identified first, so that potential ITS solutions can be identified that address the needs (not vice- versa). Therefore, one of the most important aspects to consider when developing an ITS Strategic Plan is to make sure that ITS solutions are "connected" to the identified transportation needs (i.e., traceability). For example, one stakeholder thought that their strategic plan was innovative at the time in that it was needs-focused, rather than technology-focused; this approach made the plan’s recommendations more amenable to ITS Architecture development in subsequent years. In addition, transportation problems that are identified need to be specific in terms of their location and nature in order to better gain elected official support.
These can improve efficiency in the planning and implementation process.

Lesson Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Lesson

To comment on this lesson, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.


Best Practices of Rural and Statewide ITS Strategic Planning

Author: Charles Dankocsik, Mohsen Zarean, David Register, Karen Timpone

Published By: U.S. Department of Transportation, ITS Joint Program Office

Source Date: 7/1/2002

EDL Number: 13608

Other Reference Number: FHWA-OP-02-037

URL: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/3846

Other Lessons From this Source

Lesson Contacts

Lesson Contact(s):

Mohsen Zarean
Iteris, Inc.

Lesson Analyst:

Jane Lappin
Volpe National Transportation Systems Center


Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Lesson

(click stars to rate)

Lesson Categories

Policy & Planning > Planning

Application Areas

None defined


United States

Focus Areas

None defined

Goal Areas



None defined

Lesson ID: 2005-00081