Benefit

Speed photo-radar enforcement decreased average car speeds in work zones up to 7.9 mi/hr in median lanes and 7.7 mi/hr in shoulder lanes at highway work zones, being equally as effective as the presence of police patrols with emergency lights off.

Experience with automated speed enforcement at work zones in Illinois


January 2010
I-64 St. Louis; Illinois; United States; I-55; Chicago; Illinois; United States


Summary Information

This study examined the effects of speed photo-radar enforcement on cars and trucks speeding through interstate work zones near St. Louis and Chicago. Traffic video data collected before and after the system was installed was used to estimate impacts on average vehicle speeds and degree of speeding during off-peak hours when speeding was most prevalent. Results were compared to conditions with and without police presence to gauge overall effectiveness.
Researchers examined impacts on overall traffic speeds as well as changes to speeds by vehicle type (cars and trucks) in each travel lane. The degree of speeding was divided into four levels.
  1. Percentage of drivers who exceeded work zone speed limits (55 mi/hr for both sites).
  2. Proportion of drivers who exceeded the speed limit by 5 mi/hr or less.
  3. Proportion of drivers who exceeded the speed limit by 5 to 10 mi/hr.
  4. Proportion of drivers who exceeded the speed limit by more than 10 mi/hr.

FINDINGS

  • Traffic data extracted from video recordings showed photo-radar enforcement reduced numbers of speeding cars and trucks at work zones. Speeding cars decreased 40 to 51 percent in median lanes and 7 to 57 percent in shoulder lanes. Average car speeds decreased 6.3 to 7.9 mi/hr in median lanes and 4.1 to 7.7 mi/hr in shoulder lanes.
  • Speeding trucks decreased 10 to 53 percent in median lanes and 0 to 56 percent in shoulder lanes. Average truck speeds decreased 3.4 to 6.9 mi/hr in median lanes and 4.0 to 6.1 mi/hr in shoulder lanes.
  • Spatial effects were also observed. At a location 1.5 miles downstream from each work zone the total number of speeding drivers decreased 0 to 44 percent. Persistent halo effects, however, were negligible after the system was removed.
  • Overall, the system was found equally effective as police patrols with emergency lights turned off.

Benefit Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Benefit

To comment on this summary, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

Speed Photo-Radar Enforcement Evaluation in Illinois Work Zones

Author: Benekohal, Rahim, F., et.al.

Published By: Illinois DOT

Source Date: January 2010

Other Reference Number: Report No. FHWA-ICT-10-064

URL: http://ict.illinois.edu/publications/report%20files/fhwa-ict-10-064.pdf

Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Benefit

(click stars to rate)


Goal Areas

Safety

Typical Deployment Locations

Metropolitan Areas

Keywords

smart work zone systems, automated enforcement, smart work zone, smart work zones, Smart work zone, Smart work zones, workzone, WZ

Benefit ID: 2013-00871